"If the rule was changed to read a smaller diameter line this discussion would continue only with different numbers."... gotta agree to disagree on this one Bob. My suggestion wasn't to go with a smaller diam line anyway. If that's the way it's being interpreted, then I'm not getting my suggestion across. I'll try to explain on the other thread because some replies seem to indicate that I'm being misunderstood, or I'm misunderstanding the replies.
No question same diams have worked in UK for years. Too bad we don't have EASIER access to a variety of legal lines over here like they do over there. Maybe when the States go fully to the metric system we'll be there.